My opponent attacked me and said that she knows everything about the law. The Appellate Court said she got the law wrong. So, wrong, they just reversed the decision instead of sending it back for her to correct.

" [Judge Wilson] interpreted it, that interpretation was incorrect." "We need not revisit this controversy, because, under either strict or liberal construction, the order here cannot be interpreted as [Judge Wilson] did." "To construe paragraph 2(a) as did [Judge Wilson] ignores the underlying purpose of the Act."

Click here to read it people_v._gabriel

All she needed to do was think of one word. Listen below.